As an aside. One of the tech questions at ek as of late last year has a question with such a scenario. None of the answers were as per the approach ban mentioned here jar ops et al. Scenario interception of glide above platform(3000) and deterioation of rvr before faf.
The nearest option was not to descend past the faf (publish platform 2500 meets glide.)
Maintain platform and track loc to missedapproach point and go around.The other options were ludicrous
Now it made a few assumption about having a dme for map not a da etc etc but as ek are jar compliant was it just a badly constructed question or is there still a version of an icao apprach ban that is as per this question
It was i believe constructed around a generic icao apprach ban, ie no 1000' or equivalent postion. Now the jar ban is an evolution of earlier regs vis vis faf or fap
Anyone care to comment.