Quote:
but when they are simply snagging the same thing for the same snag, then that is just being bloody minded.
Not really, but i guess it depends on the safety culture in the company. In "mine" we are required to snag the same thing if it turns up again to create a paper trail that will eventually lead to that problem being solved. If it means to replace an engine so be it.
Denti,
I can see where you are coming from, but in this case there was not a "problem to solve" it was percieved to be one, but all the maintenance manuals and the manufactures confirmed that it was acceptable, this is what was added to the tech log.
spinnaker,
No rejected takeoff, it was re snagged when it came back.. hence why I said not all items should go in when you can visibly see that the previous entry for the same thing had been cleared with the reasons why it had been stated. I agree if something had changed to warrant an entry make one, but if not, then all you are doing is cluttering up the tech log with unneccesary entries.