"What is it about the (dreaded) cubes you guys are warning each other about? Are they more difficult than the four examples we've got on the careers website?
Six sides, four possibles, but not too many possibilities after you've eliminated a couple??"
S@T - what on Earth are you trying to achieve with this comment?
There is no point to it whatsoever.
I haven't looked at the website recently but the examples I saw before were all in the T formation - have you ever considered the possibility that the patterns of the flattened cubes could be something a little more challenging that a standard T?
I'm not sure what nonesense Zooker is spouting but be careful about taking advice from him - unless it's how to listen to RT.