CASA Loses Again

[james michael]

Rotaryman

Clapton

I love your glasses - photochromatic and able to go rose coloured when looking at CASA but immediately darken when looking at the real world. Fortunately, with the staff turnover in CASA now about 50% since the Byron change process commenced, those glasses are now far less found.

The ICC you denigrate has made substantial and valuable change that impacts on genuine aviation safety and CASA safety results - I guess that's why you dislike him?

Trotting out rubbish? Seems there's a lot of organisations and people fitting your criteria - just look at the Senate Enq submissions and look at the way the organisations are all collaborating more closely these days - the old CASA 'divide and conquer' tactic is being overtaken by a mature responsible industry taking more control of its own destiny. When I note you criticising and bagging organisations like AOPA - I know they must be having some effect

just selective bits that suit your story

Too funny - now I know I hit a nerve with the 1 in 4500 when all you come back with is rhetoric and nastiness. But, one must concur - 1 in 4500 was certainly a 'selective bit to suit a CASA story'

The days of Roy Bean and his 'Ilk' are being overtaken by the new CASA regime and I am certain my research will assist that new regime to keep moving the culture so that the AVERAGE pilot, aircraft owner, AOC holder will get coaching and support, not Gestapo treatment.

Then CASA can concentrate on the Pareto imperatives - the airlines and fare paying pax, and the small minority of recalcitrants and repeat offenders.

My research has confirmed several things already (although since the information is from the defence legal person you previously criticised I guess that means you can discount it).
1. No prior convictions.
2. There was evidence in writing that a CASA FOI had made a conscious decision that no further action would be taken in relation to the VCA.

Stranger and stranger Clapton. You may wish to reconsider my earlier hint