PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The Coventry Incident - the ONLY thread?
View Single Post
Old 18th Aug 2008, 22:16
  #63 (permalink)  
Gertrude the Wombat
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Now I see where I have been getting it wrong all this time. There I was thinking that if I was cleared on an ILS approach (not a practice ILS approach) to a radar equipped airport that all I should have to do was concentrate on my scan till DH regardless of what the weather was doing outside of the window and I would be protected....clear skies and a quick lookout just being a bonus.
Yup. You've been getting it wrong.

Would any of the "see and avoid" advocates in this case like to extend their argument to explain how a large commercial aircraft with a fairly swift approach speed (say Concorde or an A380) is supposed to see and avoid a microlight in those conditions ?
Easy. Choose not to operate into airports which involve flying the approach in uncontrolled airspace.

Surely the approach is either protected or it isn't ?
Correct. And you can tell the difference by looking at the chart, which will tell you whether the approach is in controlled airspace (protected) or not (not).

Last edited by Gertrude the Wombat; 18th Aug 2008 at 22:17. Reason: Spelling
Gertrude the Wombat is offline