ChristiaanJ:
I agree with Chris. This time it was a brand-new, unflown aircraft, still on the factory site. But nothing tells me so far, that the same scenario couldn't be reproduced elsewhere.
Gabby Johnson is right!
But in all seriousness, it could just as easily be Etihad that have requested the results of any investigation to be kept between the two companies, which would put Airbus in the distinctly difficult position of having a bunch of interested parties wanting to know what happened, and a large customer who would rather they didn't tell them.