PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Couple of blade construction questions.
View Single Post
Old 11th Aug 2008, 11:47
  #44 (permalink)  
Graviman
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$0.02

Adam,

1. Allowing TR to teeter gives the lightest design. There is no design reason for rigid tail rotors - fenestrons normally use cyclic trim to keep TR in plane.

2. Low disk loading allows low auto rates. High disk inertia supplies energy to gain forward speed from hover and/or flare. Both are desirable features.

3. Any blade will autorotate as long as the pitch is set low enough to allow no net torque across span. A tapered blade will be more efficient in hover, but will suffer in forward flight.

4. Rotor coning is carefully considered in any helicopter design. A compliant root is desirable to allow a range of operational g-loadings.
Graviman is offline