You won't find a 'transcript' of a Magistrates' Court hearing anywhere, Walrus7.
Don't you realise how completely nonsensical all this looks?
You say:
- you've spoken to the gentleman charged
- he indicated he has viewed this thread
- he didn't say to you that anything you had posted was incorrect.
But earlier you said the date was the 18th and then Gupta said it was the 21st. Couldn't the gentleman remember on which date CASA was ignominiously defeated?
You also said 'we don't know if the courts had ordered some things stay out of the public domain.' Didn’t the gentleman know whether 'the courts' had issued such an order? After all, surely the gentlemen would have needed to know what the order was, in order to comply with it. And if there was any order of that kind, why have any of the details - dates and outcome - been revealed on pprune?
If I was 'charged by CASA' and the charges were in fact 'thrown out' by the court, I'd be on pprune in a microsecond, publishing the what, where and when in minute detail, and I would be perfectly entitled and free to do that. Courts don't order people not to reveal that charges against them have been dismissed.
This one still smells like an embellished, third-hand account of half a story, and it's getting smellier by the day.