It is annoying that I can't find the transcripts; indeed they may not be available to the public as others have mentioned. I know the information is good because I have spoken to the gentleman charged and he indicated he has viewed this thread. As he didn't say to me that anything I had posted was incorrect, I think it was fair of me to presume that my info is on the money.
There was more to the case than just the instance mentioned in the AOPA evidence to the senate inquiry. I don't have the full details of the other sides of it. I only know that all CASA charges were dismissed.
One of the reasons I don't want to start putting details down in that we don't know if the courts had ordered some things stay out of the public domain. I thought it was gutsy of the person who posted a name in here without getting his/her hands on the court decision first.
Walrus