Dick
Why do you keep demeaning yourself with your specious arguments.
You "failed in getting the study looked at" - was that not because you did NOT submit? CORRECT?
its pretty clear that these people believed the information that was provided in the JCP document
Unbelievable arrogance Dick. 250 submitters talking of $100M - and none of them have your astuteness? When was the last time you ran a successful airline?
Here is one extract of one of the "gullible responses"
to the JCP:
In examining the JCP/CBA we found areas of concern that will be canvassed hereunder. Two of particular note were the mixing of the benefits of the GNSS navigators with those of ADS-B, and also the benefit claims of ADS-B IN - which the JCP does not fund.
GNSS TSO C145/146 and ADS-B are not interdependent both ways: ADS-B proponents claim TSO C145/146 is needed (FDE) but the reverse is not true - yet this is clouded in the JCP/CBA where the individual benefits are mixed to make the case.
The needs of IFR versus VFR are not well canvassed in the JCP.
And here's the absolute rollicking clincher Dick.
It was recently suggested that had the CBA been a company or share prospectus, ASIC would be sharpening its pencils as the CBA does not apply the rigorous testing and substantiation expected in a companies document. We refer the reader to the ASIC site and “Guide to Reading a Prospectus” as a benchmark for examining a financial inducement as is the JCP/CBA.
What was that you said again, Dick - "these people believed the information that was provided in the JCP document".
Dick you are spouting meaningless rhetoric without substantiation in the belief that you have some deity given right to be the only one right and astute enough to comprehend what the rest of the industry cannot. A dangerous mindset Dick.
But, the above as just one example proves that industry is not as stupid as you think.
I think there's a religion somewhere waiting for a new deity figure - jump in the Citation (without me) and head there - safer than digging the hole any deeper here 