MJ
.
At the moment we have perfectly good radar to low level in places like Launceston
And
yet we seem so enamored with reverting to procedural separating from up to 30nm from the airport when the tower is open
And
why don't we fix up surveillance where it counts most and where we can have an immediate impact. ie low level radar in terminal areas.
Perhaps some of the local GA and Intra-state RPT crews might like to comment on whether they would like remote separation down to the circuit instead of what they currently get
.
Whilst we wait for that, perhaps you
MJ might give us your view on the costs to industry (comparision) of what we currently have v's Remote Surveillance Approach services!?