PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ATPL test frustrations.... part 61!
View Single Post
Old 18th July 2008 | 06:17
  #10 (permalink)  
Shrike200
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 694
Likes: 16
From: Behind 1480mm RHA equivalent
Originally Posted by Avi8tor
(a) any aeroplane with a maximum certificated mass of more than 5 700 kg,
type-certified for a minimum crew of two pilots; or
(b) any multi-engine turboprop/turbojet aeroplane with fully functional dual
instrumentation.
I suppose I'm being picky, but once the Very Light Jets arrive (if/when), somebody could do a their test on something like a Citation Mustang/ Eclipse etc merely because it has dual instruments?

Option a) actually excludes a 1900, despite all the noise about now requiring an ATP to command it! I know option b) allows it, but also allows ANY turbine, as long as it has dual instruments, and more than one engine (Cessna Conquest, Kingair C90, some VLJ's etc), regardless of weight.



I know, I know, it doesn't have dual instruments!

But this does:



As I said, I suppose I'm being picky, but the exclusion of a weight or minimum crew limit in the turbine/jet option seems to defeat the point.
Shrike200 is offline  
Reply