Any idea what is happening here, two engines (and their corresponding aircraft) with the same operator in such a short term?
Facinating that everyone who has no information and knows nothing becomes an expert on the mechanical state of the aircraft involved in these mishaps. Automatically it's a company maintanence problem...has to be, right?
Not possible that the EBBR airplane ingested a bird and experienced a compressor stall, and actually had no mechanical problem that was induced by the airplane? It's really irrelevant to guess until actual information is available...but truly amazing at the conclusion upon so which many jump...has to be an operator with bad maintenance.
Then we have a situation in Bogota. We know nothing other than the airplane is down. Sketchy details. Did the company have bad maintenance, everyone wants to know....after all, it had to be the company, right?
No possibility of bad fuel with a multiple engine flameout and torching, and an amazing case of surviving an impossible situation from the cockpit. Why would anyone want to consider something like that when one can simply rush to crucify?
Vultures. Wait for the facts.