PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 8th Jul 2008, 15:34
  #1777 (permalink)  
Backwards PLT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So let me get this right - the justification for STOVL F35 is that conventional carrier landings are hard and require constant training whereas VLs on carriers are much easier and don't? LOL - as the yoof say. Can't wait to banter the harrrier mates about that!
Backwards PLT is offline