I think this is unfair,
JS:
[Mr Ilyk] was part of the problem for many years.
Mr Ilyk was an advisor. It was up to those he advised to act on the advice or not.
I thought Mr Ilyk's evidence and submission were excellent.
It's obvious from his evidence and submission - and that of others - that his advice started to fall on increasingly deaf and eventually hostile ears.
You're not suggesting that he would, for example, have advocated that CASA go easy on the LHR operator during audits or in respect of audit findings?