Lost - Bristows ran a SAR service for 20 years and told the MCA what they wanted to hear.
Really? Would you like to expand on that or is this just another of your sweeping statements with supported with no evidence? Are you saying Bristows lied to the MCA?
The MCA were unable to get unbiased aviation information from industry (surprise surprise) when the contract was due for renewal which is why the military were involved.
So the only place the MCA can get unbaised information is from the military. Well, judging by your continual attacks on Civvies I hardly think that the military are in a position to offer unbaised information. Maybe this is why the SAR-H team hasn't appeared to consult with the Civy SAR crews on SAR-H and are basing the future of SAR on their own knowleague of old SAR technology currently used by the RAF rather than talking to the people who are operating the new technology? Or is it just the 'RAF know best' attitude?
PS you don't have arguments, you have comments on other peoples arguments - not the same thing
No there're counter arguments which you choose to ignore because it doesn't suit your propaganda.