If in revision process, we need to move fast
Paco: How many talented persons are thus far involved in this anonymous revision-in-process? How can one contribute to it, the better to ensure that shortfalls in the old version are rectified?
Is the process open to debate, or are the principles certain of their omniscience? Has there been an undercover call for inputs to the profession, or is it being kept secret? Do they already have a devil's advocate, or can I volunteer for the position?
Yes, my dog-eared copy is available. But it comes with considerable verbal commentary and background; would there be a way to input all that?