Say again slowly is 100% right on this one, and I'm only coming back to the thread to support him. I raised two issues in the past, RT standards, and one re the UK invasion of LFAT. I was accused of whinging and being pedantic.
I have never had a problem with any of the many "inst dual" flights, or reval/renewal tests I have conducted. My priority is always to help people continue flying or come back to flying, and close to their original PPL standard. Is that unreasonable? As for LASORS, yes it is guidance but what else is there? And it is provided as the main source of CAA info. Can you imagine if during a court case a defence was " I take no notice of LASORS, it's only for guidance and anyway I disagree with the guy who wrote it" !