Quote:
This was the position on April 13 when the Sunday Times first reported on the QQ fuel system report, ie before the inquest. Two months on, nothing seems to have changed.
The report is older than this, so are you sure nothing has changed? I thought you mentioned earlier you got "no comment" from MoD before publishing?
You're right JFZ. On checking the first article did elicit a no comment from the MoD. The first reference to the situation being as the Times described it on Monday, ie 21 being dealt with, 3 being considered and 6 irrelevant because of the ban on AAR, was in a Browne letter to Angus Robertson on May 20 and was stated to me by the MoD for the second Sunday Times article on the QQ October 2006 fuel system report which was published May 25th and included that same status report. Apologies.