Two points, J
First, for those who were paying attention, the reason for the 2003 cut-off for the inquiry is obvious: that was the year the CASA Board was abolished, and the current government was elected with a policy of re-establishing the CASA Board. So, the current government needs an inquiry to prove that things got worse, not better, when the CASA Board was abolished, so as to retrospectively justify a decision that's already been made.
Secondly, you're about as sharp as a bowling ball.