Creampuff
So on the matter of referral of the Uzu breach to the DPP based on Civil Aviation Regulation 228, at best there are only two views: that of Mr Sherman and that of Mr Boys.
There were 3 legal opinions. Sherman, Skehill and CASA's General Counsel. Mr Boys had a contrary opinion. Obviusly those who prefer conspiracy theories will side with Boys because it is convenient to do so - especially if you happen to dislike Toller et al. So why let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy. There was no misleading of anyone. Tom Sherman was smart and independent enough to make his own informed judgment based on facts - not innuendo.