Seven months ago - 6 Dec 07 - BBC Scotland posted a somewhat premature headline ‘Browne re-examines Chinook crash’. However, as we all know, nothing of note has materialized.
I was intrigued by a sentence BD posted earlier this year:
I think the only positive at the moment is that we haven't been given a 'No'. I'm sure we will have an answer as soon as the MoD realise the importance of the evidence presented to them.
Clearly, 7 months later, the MOD has failed to realise the importance of the evidence presented to them. In any other ‘judicial’ review, this new information would have helped to accelerate the removal of the unsubstantiated Gross Negligence finding against Jon and Rich.
I struggle to see why the evidence submitted cannot now be placed on this Forum to be discussed? Surely we are way passed compromising this review by doing so.
AA
Last edited by Sand4Gold; 6th Jun 2008 at 12:20.