Originally Posted by Lemurian
At that value, the required wet runway length - from the *in flight performance* charts would be 2100 meters
To me your number is a bit exaggerated ... I agree with your weight estimate but I would stop it at 1500M ... NO MARGIN ... even better with thrust reversers.
Now I may have miscalculate something ... (?)
bubbers44, for comparison do you know what would be the number for a 757 ?
Dream Land, a bit disappointing you attack someone but you're not able to back up your statement. Apology does not hurt either ... especially from a 'check airman' and your guys will appreciate.