I think we should review the old nugget that 'the number of foggy days means we can't justify Cat III equipment'.
In two weeks, I have been delayed a total of 17 hours because of fog at SYD and MEL that would not have been a problem with Cat III approaches.
The costs to the industry are enormous:
- Extra fuel consumption holding
- Extra fuel consumption diverting
- Passenger accomodation when connections are compromised
- Food for passengers that get stranded enroute
- Network disruption (aircraft and crew in the wrong places)
- Consequential delays trying to get the network back into order again
- Maintenance costs associated with extra flight time (holding and diverting)
- Extra customer service staff costs as huge and extended workloads are handled
- etc
- etc
Not to mention the bad publicity that our industry is exposed to when network chaos ensues.
I agree with other posters that the lack of 'first world facilities' is symptomatic of a lamentable lack of investment in our air transport system. The problem is now decades old.
Every jet transport aircraft in Australia is capable of Cat IIIB - but our ground equipment is four times as incompetent.
So - let's stop saying we can't justify the upgrade and get on with it.