Originally Posted by nitty gritty
The company stated that Polar's scope could remain in the combined contract, but the Polar union chose to stop the negotiation process instead.
So you believe what the company tells you? I mean, that's how I read it, what with your underlining for emphasis and all.
I'm just checking. These are the same people that brought you AACS, a "gateway basing" agreement that has you travel on days off and pay tax, and brags about how much they can involuntarily stretch their "crew resources" to the investors.
I personally would have a hard time believing anything they said if the above points were true.