PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - High accident rates in light twins an alternative?
Old 30th May 2008, 19:09
  #44 (permalink)  
Pace
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GR8handini

I agree with all you are saying here. Especially about what I referred to as step climbs and you referred to as zoom climbs.

Yes the faster you go in level flight the more kinetic energy you have to play with hence in light draggy aircraft you do not have a lot of margin.

In jets the margin between IAS and stall at high levels is much smaller so equally are the benefits of a zoom climb but it still can be played with in higher levels where your climb rate is poor but you still have enough margin to make a difference.

Go to high and you come down regardless or your in dead mans corner.

But it is still a game of playing with drag, power and kinetic energy.

I really dont think we are that far apart. All I will say about these Graphs is that they are designed for engine out CLIMBS and that is where we are apart because I am not referring to CLIMBS at all.

I do not fault or question these graphs or what they say.

Pace
Pace is offline