Can we please get back on topic.
I beleive the candidate for president along with GC nominations Numbers 1,2,3,5,9,12,16 stand for constructive change in direction to one of holding the company to account for transgression's to our COS, falling renumeration, rostering practices etc.
I am told # 11 did little in the past tenure so will not be getting my vote. I know none of the FO's and SO's but applaud them for "attempting" to have a say in the direction their career will take and as a result they shall also get my vote.
I am interested to hear others opinions of the candidates direction and ask that we keep it on topic rather than letting it drift into individual character assassination.
Last edited by fire wall; 28th May 2008 at 23:39.