Hand Solo,
I think we'll just have to agree to disagree.
I think what Keith meant was that Walsh was not offered a bonus because he went to the chairman a few weeks earlier and said he did not wish to take one. That has been widely reported.
As he was not then offered one, he couldn't turn down that non-existent offer.
He was entitled to a bonus. The criteria is laid down every year in the report and accounts, and much of this criteria was met.