PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - US ‘Public Use’ aviation – what are the airworthiness implications?
Old 20th May 2008, 09:04
  #42 (permalink)  
Jackonicko
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,192
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Senior Pilot,

Thanks!


Helimark,

Wouldn't it be safer if you were flying a twin with Class 1 performance?

Of course some object to the Police/Border Patrol/Forest Service use of ex-military helicopters for commercial reasons - the agencies aren't buying sparkly new helicopters which help (say) Bell's bottom line, and give business to a dealer, etc. That's not what I'd call a good reason.

But others object for more 'high minded' reasons. The airworthiness of (inevitably very old) ex-military aircraft, once they're being outside the military airworthiness and engineering environment is sometimes questionable, otherwise there'd be fewer restrictions on civilian operators using them.



Incidentally, I understand that one organisation which does not require CPLs in all of its flying 'billets' is the Border Patrol.

I believe that there have been questions about pilot quality in some areas of the Forest Service and some of its associated state-level bodies.

I quoted a report about one Sheriff's Department.

Some here acknowledge that there are a very, very few bad apples.
Jackonicko is offline