Courtney's post is quite right - how can any legal mind without some knowledge of aviation and supporting technology ever see through the misrepresentation, deception, spin, omissions, and b*llsh*t that has pervaded this case.
.
SFFP
You seem the ideal volunteer to give us all a summary of how range and bearing data are passed from an ARS6 to the HSI in an HC2 Chinook as was the case in several after ZD576.
Internal to the a/c stuff like this would not be a big secret would it? - I mean, the overall system was common in other NATO countries back in 94.
It would surely be of great academic interest to all.
May even be one reason to dump waypoint A if routed through the CDU - hypothetically if equip fitted of course.
.
As a general point to all in the Mull group - don't think there is any good from allowing this incident to slip away uninvestigated even when the plots' names are cleared - the bombing may have stopped but in all other respects the outcome of the peace process is lousy.
Those who enthusiastically block full investigation of what was going on possibly in the belief that they are acting for the greater good of the country are not appreciating just how bad it is to abandon a large section of the British people whose sovereign control of their own community was undermined by the effective end to the anti-terrorism effort that this crash brought. The implications of any possible foul play by the intelligence lot in this incident are just too dire to let them get away with it, if this was the case - we just have to explore such possibilities thoroughly, especially when it is so obvious that there was a cover up to some degree regarding the conditions and activity near the Mull.
Last edited by walter kennedy; 11th May 2008 at 14:36.
Reason: grammar