To answer the questions:
I have to wonder what Chinook240 is trying to achieve by resurrecting old and discredited arguments,
To ensure that the icing clearance of the Chinook HC Mk 2 was correctly represented following certain discussions by previous contributors regarding
inadvertent (hope you like the use of bold) IMC. I don't believe I have misquoted any facts, indeed I hoped to highlight them. I also did not resurrect anything as the thread was already running along these lines.
I do disagree with:
used a speed and power combination that is unrecognisable as a Chinook technique
But what do I know about the Chinook? PC obviously knows more.