Thank you, JW for confirmation. May I have your comments on para 2.3.3. of the 'Analysis' regarding SOPs? I still read Captain 'flying', F/O 'monitoring'? What do you read? I actually (reading 'between' the AIB lines, particularly the last para of 2.3.2) think the approach mindset could well have been to set up a dual a/p Cat I based on the wx info they had? This does explain the apparent anomaly in handling.
BTW, I agree with your comment on the possible confusion amongst the readers, but I still reckon the Captain is 'PNF' on a correctly flown IIIA approach from handover until 'Decide'?
PS - you taught me a new word tonight