I had a post on here which pointed out the difference between the BACC who sold their future colleagues downstream regarding their pension entitlements
and the Grangemouth strikers who, whatever else you may think of them, are at least striking to protect their future colleagues' benefits
.
I pointed out how typical this was of the BACC, particularly with reference to the way they seek support from us, their Industry colleagues, whilst calling any OS joinees or aspirants
SCABS. I concluded that BACC seemed to control BALPA, and were only interested in preserving their own narrow status quo.
I suggested that Ba resembled the BL monolith of the 70s, and gave as examples all the recent publicity.
Someone removed that post - I wonder why. More BA fact distortion and apparent censorship. Pathetic, typical, but pathetic.