PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - assumed temperature reduction
View Single Post
Old 26th April 2008 | 14:04
  #6 (permalink)  
barit1
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Old Fella is right to an extent - it's the same objective for derate vs FLEX thrust.

However the procedures, and accompanying limitations, are separate and distinct. Derate is accomplished in fixed increment(s), and may be applied whenever TOGW vs RW available permit.

FLEX (ATM) is continuously variable up to 25% reduction, but it's prohibited w/ contaminated runway. An engine condition monitoring program is also required with FLEX to assess engine health.

And both procedures have been around over 30 ++ years - long before FADEC and other magic boxes existed.
barit1 is offline  
Reply