PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - assumed temperature reduction
View Single Post
Old 26th April 2008 | 10:45
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fella
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: Wingham NSW Australia
De-Rated Thrust vs Assumed Temp Method

Sorry Denti, in my day we used "de-rate" to come up with the same outcome as you guys today kidding your "electronic whiz-bang systems". Essentially the thrust required in both cases is less than that available up to the "flat rated" thrust. On the RB211-524's rated thrust is available up to 29 Degrees C OAT.
Old Fella is offline  
Reply