Yes, you're right, your explanation sound much more clear that mine... and besides, yes, sadly you are again completely right concerning the application and compliance with ESARR 5, even SES regulations. As far as I know, SES Package II is in a final consultation phase despite you said, the level of compliance is not the same. Maybe because all Air Navigation Services Providers had received the Certification of compliance with SES regulations issued by each National Regulator Authority, and don't want to go further. Maybe with The introduction of EASA ( Did you read about the NPA issued by EASA -Nş 2007.16- ?) this can change, but for the moment I'm not so much optimistic.
Safety is not always equal to expensive, but an excess of "business mania" in a public service like provision of Air Navigation Services ... can carry out to a lackness of Safety. Just remember Überlingen or Linate.
Look at this link :
http://www.project-mosaic.eu/