PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Qantas Link 717 hard landing Darwin
View Single Post
Old 7th March 2008 | 07:39
  #112 (permalink)  
PBL
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 965
Likes: 110
From: Bielefeld, Germany
Old Fella,

Understood that your comments were focused.

The point about the flaps 25/idle reverse versus flaps 30/max reverse is of course pertinent; the ATSB found that the former configuration was "not appropriate for operations onto water-affected runways" and the other configuration was "appropriate". However, they say that inter alia the inappropriate selection of flaps 25/idle reverse (which selection was made before landing) was an error "primarily due to the absence of appropriate company procedures and training", and I would rather point the finger where the ATSB says it should be pointed.

PBL
PBL is offline  
Reply