PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Collision Avoidance
View Single Post
Old 26th February 2008 | 08:21
  #101 (permalink)  
Rod1
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
From: Midlands
bookworm

I think the point about FLARM is that it is very popular in parts of Europe so it has an installed base. However the CAA have rejected it and given a full explanation as to why. I have never seen this refuted, and as far as I know FLARM is off the table.

wigglyamp

I do not think CS23.561 would apply to most of the aircraft with no electrics. Most would come under CS-VLA or Section S which I think uses lighter loads. In LAA land you could certainly get approval for a mounting box which would allow a battery to be clipped in and removed. Approval might involve full stress calculations etc though and this only overcomes one of the many problems such as weight, space etc.

Rod1
Rod1 is offline  
Reply