Err, Media Watch is only interested in cases of dodgy journalism. Where is the dodgy journalism in the "bloodbath" article?
When a company issues a press release (as appears to have happened in this case), and a journalist builds an article around it, as has happened in this case, that is perfectly normal, run-of-the-mill jounalism.
It is not dodgy journalism simply because you disagree with some of the "facts" contained in the press release!
The Media Watch people will be scratching their heads over why they are getting your emails.
Somebody said something about "getting our side of the story out".
What is your side of the story? That pilots are leaving Rex because they can get better pay elsewhere?
What is the story in that? Workers are always leaving their current employer when they can get something better elsewhere (not just pilots). Always have and always will.
If you get a reply from Media Watch, copy it into this thread won't you?