PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Pan OPS 4
Thread: Pan OPS 4
View Single Post
Old 10th February 2008 | 11:14
  #5 (permalink)  
OzExpat


PPRuNeaholic
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
From: Cairns FNQ
Devil

I confess to being as irked as keithl but I think that the explanation is quite simple, in that most folk equate PANS OPS to being one document and, therefore, the singular form PAN seems more appropriate. Perhaps folks need to be aware that there are 2 distinct volumes?

The devil is in the detail...
OzExpat is offline  
Reply