Originally Posted by wilyflier
Like terrorist activities this sort of rubbish should not ever have been publicised.
What, sort of like on the principle that if they'd just told the airport about it, it would have been sorted out? Oink, oink, flap
Originally Posted by wilyflier
The original perpetrators should have been "disappeared" without trace. leaving idiot journalists to take the same risk.
What, the idiot perpetrators that drove straight back out again with a cheery wave?
Originally Posted by wilyflier
We have quite enough cost and hassle as it is,think of the extra opportunities you publicise.
Thanks but, like many, it's not the Mr Bean wing of Convenient Bogeymen Inc. that have me concerned; anyone with an ounce of sense tries to work out and protect against the next attack, not the last one. Making airports face up to their genuine weaknesses by publicising them is fine by me.