No one complains about being knocked back (although none of us like it!) but they do want to be given a fair chance and see the best candidates chosen.
From the information I have this is not sour grapes in any way shape or form. If Zoom or others prefer to stick their heads in the sand and pretend they have done everything right then so be it, but the number of posters here would indicate that someone ought to sit up and take notice.
I believe from pre interview research that one of Zooms mantra's is recruit and retain the best, can 3 "pickers" really identify the best amongst 30 applicants building paper towers?? Thats going some in my book!!!