Okay...
I support the fact that the managers have to face trial, although I doubt it will end in a criminal conviction as the case might be very hard to prove legally. It might be a small first step towards a more thorough approach to growth.
However, your post is very personal, shows a lot of frustration(?) and statements as "was a good buddy", "considered a person non grata in swiss upper society" (how do you know?) and "proves he's good at nothing" are not statements of objectiveness. Your comment about the current CEO of Swiss (if I have read it correctly) seems almost ridiculous, given the fact that Swiss is now a better-than-average-profitable airline within Europe.
It's been six and half a year by now.. why is there still so much emotion in it?
What do you think? Does this case has a chance for success? What are the points pro and contra - not emotionally, but what could be decisive from a legal standpoint?