Right Way Up : no offence felt really !!
You have proven that my opinion was not correct, thanks for that as I was looking for confirmation/refute of it
Now, concerning those flt ctl laws : Airbus has "fine tuned" a lot on their different machines. Mostly following incidents/accidents. And indeed this was not always directly communicated to us pilots... (example : flt ctl new software implementation before update of FCOM...yes it happenened!) Hopefully this "communication" has improved they say...
An example of modif being the modification of the flare law on A320 following an accident of Iberia in Bilbao during a windshear... (yes...what a coïncidence right !)
I have to admit, it apparently only consist of a modification on the pitch law though and not on the roll law (still roll in normal law as you very correctly say).
The "new" pitch law giving roughly more control to pilots than before in high AOA... That was communicated correctly in due time apparently.
Now, to my understanding in this landing, the aircraft touched down before the bank developped (am I right ???). Hence, I suppose it is then in "direct" law - ground law - as this law seems to be active 0.5s after touch and through take off till 50 feet... Again, just a question I am asking myself in view of better understanding of this beautiful machine !
flyer146