you seem to resist change at just about every move.
Nope.
Just a firm believer that in a particular scenario the class of airspace and level of air traffic service should be determined by thorough safety & cost-benefit analysis, not rhetoric or simply copying something that somewhere else in the world appears to work for their local environment.
And critical elements are widespread industry support for whatever falls out of such analysis and thorough education, both lacking in virtually all airspace reform in this country since the 1990's, resulting in rollbacks and amendments - and $M's down the drain.