To reiterate my earlier comment it is clear to me we are convinced of the case for the IMC rating. The CAA are convinced. EASA would seem persuaded. BALPA support the rating.
Are we that disingenuous to our fellow pilots in Europe as to not at least seek to convince them of the merit of our case?
Do we truly believe that they are against the rating for the reasons regurgitated on here by a few?
Or might it be because we have not taken the trouble to properly present the case and the evidence?
After all we now have at least four years in which to do so!!
(Edited to add in so far as Rustle's question is concerned, and I am NOT making this comment to be argumentative, I didnt understand the question, so for those that did perhaps you could spell it out if it has not now been answered).