Firstly thank you to those who have phoned, emailed and posted here already.
I will attempt to answer some of the queries / criticisms so far.
The show is a serious look at dramatic rescues. The focus is therefore on the aftermath of an incident. The show will be aired before the watershed (I recognise this is an international website and other nations may not be familiar with this term, but it means the content has to adhere to guidelines to protect younger viewers) and so we're not looking to scare the life out of anyone by over sensationalising perilous situations.
I'm not going to condemn other people in my industry for using words such as "plummet" or "plunge" as I understand they are attempting to maximise the impact of their stories in order to gain a higher market share. I can confirm however that this is not the kind of show we are trying to make.
We are making every attempt to contact everyone involved with the stories we are telling in order to interview them for the programme and present a balanced view of what happened.
As for "non-flying stories" I figured while I had people's attention I ought to make it clear that we're not just making a programme about air related incidents so if anyone has another story let me know.
I appreciate there will be some people who already have strong opinions based on previous TV shows, but I would like to point out that this is a brand new show and some of the criticisms which are being brought up have nothing to do with our programme. We are in contact with a number of bravery awards organisations and my own take on the show is that we're presenting the stories of these people, and others like them, to a wider audience.
I'm not trying to criticise anyone else's opinions or views, only to express my own and hopefully alleviate some of your fears about the shows.
If there are any further queries please let me know by any of the methods posted already.
Finally thank you very much for taking the time to read these messages and allowing me to post on your website.