And then
All future commands are on B scales - whether that be in KA or CX. So there is no point comparing the cost of my A scale to KA B scales. You are talking of bringing 'cheap' KA crew to replace "expensive" CX crew. Given that KA earn more than CX B scalers, how is that cheaper than using our 'cheaper' B scalers?
Rather than focus on any possible disadvantages that a merger might result in, focus on this: over the next 10 years there will be 500 less commands, 500 more senior pilots at staff travel and up to 500 less basings available due to the introduction of RA65.
We seem to be running around blaming everyone but the culprit for our current problems. KA and any possible merger are not the problem.
Over the last 5 or so years - KA has had no payrise until now - that payrise is worth approx 20% when you count improvements to conditions as well. EK have given over 40% payrises. QF have given an effective payrise well over 20% when you count salary and increases in MGH etc and we are still waiting on the results of EBA 8. The rumour mill has it that EK will increase salaries by 30-40% next April.
B scalers in CX get 3%.
2008 CX payscales are equivalent to what CX paid in 1992. At the zoologist's and mathematician's proposed rate of increase, B scales will finally reach A scales around 2015.
Ok, any questions on who the bad guy is?