Courtney
"If it waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck it probably is a duck."
The whole thrust of the argument is precisely that, PROBABLY!
The required level of proof to arrive at the verdict reached is simply not there as there were NO witness's to the actual crash, no flight data evidence, in fact not a shred of evidence to prove conclusively what you suggest.
That said if you were to ask most of us looking to have this verdict over turned what we THINK happened then I for one would have to agree that what you suggest is the most probable cause but as there is not one single person on this planet today who ACTUALLY knows what happened that fateful day you surely must agree that the required level of proof required has not been satisfied........................although if you are who I think you are you will never ever admit to that