courtney
You obviously haven't spent too long looking at this subject. Let me remind you of a posting from a couple of pages back:
I'm sure you will remember what they wrote:
Quote:
The Board was unable to positively determine the sequence of events leading up to the accident, and therefore concluded that although it is likely that Flt Lt Tapper Made an error of judgement in the conduct of the attempted climb over the Mull of Kintyre, it would be incorrect to criticise him for human failings based on the available evidence
and:
Quote:
The Board concluded there were no human failings with respect to Flt Lt Cook
This was the position of the 3 RAF officers (2 of whom were experienced-and recent-Chinook pilots) who actually conducted the investigation on behalf of the RAF.
You obviously know something they did not, and/or are using a different standard of proof.
Please enlighten us.
What a coincidence you have only appeared on Pprune in the last 24 hours, and shortly before the SoS reconsiders this case! Weren't you interested in the Mull before??
Some of us have been on the case of this miscarriage for the last 13 and a half years.
I guess we just won't go away!